Archive for November 27th, 2010

November 27th, 2010

Jim DiPaola’s career in politics

by DickH

The news that Middlesex County Sheriff James DiPaola died suddenly today was stunning and saddening. I’ll leave it to others to report on the circumstances of his passing but perhaps a short summary of his political career might be appropriate. Motivated by last week’s news of DiPaola’s retirement, I wrote a brief history of Middlesex County Sheriffs since World War Two. The DiPaola-related portions of that appear below along with a review of the late Sheriff’s electoral record as a state representative.

Ironically, DiPaola’s paths to the House of Representatives and to the Sheriff’s office were opened by the scandals of others. In 1990, Malden was represented in the House by John McNeil but he was soon engulfed by a wave of troubles. In the summer of 1991, he was accused of surreptitiously videotaping his young daughter’s 18-year old nanny while the teenager showered. While that was being investigated, McNeil was indicted on multiple counts of extortion for allegedly trying to coerce campaign contributions from a Malden businessman. Needless to say, McNeil was unavailable to run for reelection in 1992.

With an open seat, six Malden Democrats entered the 1992 primary for the Thirty-Sixth Middlesex District: Arthur Boyle, Thomas Chausse, James DiPaola, Stephen Finn, James Flanagan, and Kathy Gardner-Gill. DiPaola won by a comfortable margin, receiving 2144 votes to second place finisher Flanagan’s 1664. With no Republican on the ballot, DiPaola won the general election without opposition. DiPaola was reelected in 1994 without opposition in either the primary or the general election.

At the same time that DiPaola was running for his second term in the House, Middlesex County Sheriff John McGonigle ran afoul of the law, was indicted, convicted, and removed from office in late 1992. Republican William Weld appointed Brad Bailey, a former Middlesex Assistant District Attorney and current Assistant US Attorney, to fill the office of Sheriff until the next state election in the fall of 1996. Forsaking a run for a third term as State Representative, DiPaola joined three others in the Democratic primary for Middlesex County Sheriff. His opponents were Ed Kennedy, a former Lowell city councilor and current Middlesex County Commissioner; Ed Rideout, a probation officer from Cambridge; and Leonard Golder of Stow. DiPaola won the Democratic primary and also won the general election, receiving 310,699 votes to Bailey’s 247,397.

Because the 1996 election was only to fill the two years remaining in McGonigle’s unexpired term, DiPaola had to run again in the next state election (1998) for a full term of his own. DiPaola was challenged in the Democratic primary by former Lowell City Councilor and current Middlesex County Commissioner Ed Kennedy. DiPaola defeated Kennedy, 101,924 to 52,772 and was unopposed in the general election.

Six years later (in 2004), DiPaola was again challenged in the Democratic Primary, this time by Robert DeMoura of Chelmsford who was also a Lowell police captain, and by Brian Gillis of Lowell. DiPaola won easily and was again unopposed in the general election. In the midst of this term in the summer of 2007 when Marty Meehan resigned from Congress to become Chancellor of UMass Lowell, DiPaola briefly entered the special election to succeed Meehan but dropped out after just a few weeks.

In November 2010, DiPaola was elected to another six-year term as Sheriff. When news broke that he had retired just before the election so that he would be eligible to receive both a pension on his full salary as Sheriff, he announced that he would resign the office of Sheriff on January 6, 2011, an act that has been overcome by today’s events.

November 27th, 2010

“City of Lights Parade” by Nancye Tuttle

by DickH

Nancye Tuttle braved tonight’s cold to take in Lowell’s annual City of Lights parade. As she explains in her blog post about the parade, her effort was amply rewarded. She, and everyone she ran into, seemed to have a great time.

November 27th, 2010

Political patronage and hazing

by DickH

Between the recent release of the report on corrupt hiring practices in the state’s probation department and the cancellation of several high school sporting events, patronage and corruption have been much in the news. In his “Talking Politics” blog at the Boston Phoenix, columnist David Bernstein makes a connection between the two.

According to Bernstein, many people view both hazing and patronage as “perfectly normal and acceptable” practices that might look bad but are “nothing you should get in trouble for.” Regarding hazing, Bernstein says this: “Bulletin: it’s illegal, immoral, flat-out wrong to physically torture kids.” As for political patronage, he says about the same thing: “Bulletin: It is flat-out wrong for someone with political power to use that power to get someone a job, a contract, or other preferential treatment from the government that is supposed to be awarded by merit.”

Bernstein quickly leaves hazing behind and focuses on patronage, especially patronage at the state house. He writes “It’s very hard for pols who have always known that system, and always been part of that system, to mentally accept that the behavior they have participated in for so long is not acceptable.”

While a number of elected officials have responded to questions about the probation department report by saying something like “there’s nothing wrong with me making a call to help a constituent” even the folks saying that – or most of them at least – know that it would be best for them to stay clear of the governmental hiring and promotion process. Perhaps a statewide law similar to that which forbids city councilors in the Plan E form of government from influencing personnel decisions, would be best. Here’s what Massachusetts General Laws chapter 43, section 107 says:

Neither the city council nor any of its committees or members shall direct or request the appointment of any person to, or his removal from, office by the city manager or any of his subordinates, or in any manner take part in the appointment or removal of officers and employees in that portion of the service of said city for whose administration the city manager is responsible. Except for the purpose of inquiry, the city council and its members shall deal with that portion of the service of the city as aforesaid solely through the city manager, and neither the city council nor any member thereof shall give orders to any subordinate of the city manager either publicly or privately. Any member of the city council who violates, or participates in the violation of, any provision of this section shall be punished by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars or by imprisonment for not more than six months, or both, and upon final conviction thereof his office in the city council shall thereby be vacated and he shall never again be eligible for any office or position, elective or otherwise, in the service of the city.

I suspect most elected officials who make job recommendations for constituents would welcome a reason not to do that. While some might truly see their mission in office as helping as many people as possible in any way possible, most make the calls because they have a hard time saying no when someone asks. Boston Mayor Thomas Menino was once quoted in a newspaper as saying he truly dislike hiring anyone because with ten applicants for every job, you’re always left with nine people who hate you and one ingrate. With a law that criminalized “making calls”, it would be easier to say no.

November 27th, 2010

City of Lights Parade Today @ 4.30 pm

by PaulM

From the City of Lowell website, here’s the schedule for today’s City of Lights celebration, staring at 2 pm with trolley rides and up thru parade kick-off at 4.30 pm at Jackson and Central streets.