John Edward, a resident of Chelmsford who earned his master’s degree at UMass Lowell and is an adjunct professor of economics at Bentley University, contributes the following column
The state of Massachusetts bucked the national trend in the 2010 elections. While most states were trending “red,” Massachusetts preserved its’ “blue” identity. The mistake in reading these results is to assume that confirms Massachusetts is a liberal state. Public policy defines liberalism, not political party affiliation.
In addition to electing democrats to all the statewide offices, and electing an entirely democratic delegation to the United States House of Representatives, we still have democrats in firm control of both state houses. However, in many cases the policies adopted by our blue legislature, and blue Governor, are far from liberal
Tax policy says a lot about how liberal a government is. In The Conscience of a Conservative, Senator Barry Goldwater said: “government has a right to claim an equal percentage of each man’s wealth, and no more” (author’s emphasis). In Massachusetts, we fall far short of this conservative goal.
Massachusetts is one of only seven states that have a personal income tax without progressive rates. The state taxes your income at 5.3 percent whether you make $40,000 or $400,000 or $4 million. A progressive income tax is necessary to offset other taxes that are regressive – where low-income earners people pay more of their income than the wealthy.
In Massachusetts, the personal income tax represents only about one-third of state and local tax revenue. We rely heavily on regressive sales and property taxes. Overall, the tax structure of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts is very regressive. Low-income earners pay taxes at a rate twice as high as the wealthy. Massachusetts may be blue, but a regressive tax structure is not liberal. read more »
Recent Comments