Archive for March 10th, 2011

March 10th, 2011

“Getting crude oil wrong” by Mike Luciano

by DickH

Mike Luciano reacts to a recent Lowell Sun editorial on domestic oil production:

Tuesday’s Lowell Sun featured an editorial about how America can control and drive down the cost of oil and gasoline by producing more oil domestically. But like many Americans, the Sun’s editorial writer does not understand the nature of commodities markets, as indicated by this passage:

“While pushing more domestic oil into the U.S. market will offset huge price swings, it’s not enough to drive costs lower. For that, Obama should also relax offshore drilling regulations that have prevented oil companies from tapping into known reserves off the Gulf Coast and elsewhere.

“America has relied too long on foreign interests to solve its energy problems. That dependency must end. Obama would be wise to use our reserves and offshore deposits to control U.S. costs…”

Tapping America’s strategic reserves because a barrel of oil costs $105 is not prudent by any stretch of the imagination. There is only enough oil in the SPR to power the country for about a month and a half at current consumption levels. These reserves should be left alone in case of a real national emergency.

More than that, the writer seems to think that if only the US produced more oil, the price of oil in America would decrease; hence the suggestion to tap the SPR and approve more offshore drilling applications in an effort to increase supply and “control US costs.” But the price of crude oil—even crude pumped from American soil—is traded internationally on commodities exchanges such as the New York Mercantile Exchange. This means even the price of domestically produced oil is affected by what goes on in oil exporting countries around the world. For example, one American petroleum brand, West Texas Intermediate crude, was trading around $105 a barrel today. Now that’s American oil, and what’s going on in the Middle East is having zero effect on the supply of WTI, and yet the price for WTI has been rising along with Middle Eastern petroleum brands, North African brands, Brent Sea crude, and every other kind of crude oil in the world. And that’s because they trade closely with one another on global commodities exchanges. read more »

March 10th, 2011

Merrimack rising – March 9, 2011

by DickH

Tony Sampas shows us that the Merrimack River continues to rise, even before the next patch of rain arrives.

March 10th, 2011

Glen Johnson on David Broder With a Lowell Connection

by Marie

On today’s  “Political Intelligence” page of the Boston Globe, senior political writer Glen Johnson tell us of his meetings and inaction of the recently deceased writer and columnist David Broder. The site posts the actual note from Broder to Johnson – a longtime admirer –  who was seeking a position with him at the Washington Post. It didn’t happen but the encouragement was appreciated. They later crossed paths during the Paul Tsongas campaign for President in 1992 and later during other presidential campaigns while with AP. Johnson obviously held Broder in high regard.

Lowell reference in the article:

Months later, lightning struck. At the height of President George H.W. Bush’s popularity following Operating Desert Storm, a former US senator from the hometown of my small newspaper, Lowell’s own Paul Tsongas, announced improbably that he’d challenge the incumbent president for re-election in 1992.

The Sun remains a relatively small paper, but it had a big heart, especially for the local story, so, by then as the Lowell city political reporter, the editor sent me out on the trail…

In April 1992, after Tsongas quit the race and “Comeback Kid” Bill Clinton was en route to the Democratic nomination and presidency, I wrote a thank-you note to Broder.

“I wanted to let you know that I enjoyed meeting you while I chased around Paul Tsongas for The Sun,” I said.

Read the full article here at Boston.com.

Note on Glen Johnson:

About Political Intelligence

Glen Johnson Glen Johnson is Politics Editor at boston.com and lead blogger for “Political Intelligence.” He moved to Massachusetts in the fourth grade, and has covered local, state, and national politics for over 25 years. E-mail him at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
March 10th, 2011

Newt Gingrich’s Patriotism Leads to Infidelity

by Tony

Lately, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich talks more and more about a possible run for president in 2012.  Early on, one of the major issues candidate Gingrich will need to address is his past infidelities. Recently, Gingrich sat down with David Brody of the Christian Broadcasting Network and talked about religion and past mistakes. During that interview the Speaker made this statement regarding his past…

There’s no question at times of my life, partially driven by how passionately I felt about this country, that I worked far too hard and that things happened in my life that were not appropriate,”

Now, I truly respect Gingrich’s repentance and his dedication to his religion…but, it seems to me Newt is saying one of the reasons he cheated on his wife was because he loved his country? That’s a new one.

Then again…maybe its not so new…After Brutus killed Julius Caesar 2000 years ago, I think he spinned the crime in a similar way… “It is not that I loved Caesar less, it is that I loved Rome more”.

Listen for your self…

March 10th, 2011

Union counter-proposal on health insurance falls woefully short by Marjorie Arons-Barron

by Tony

The entry below is being cross posted from Marjorie Arons-Barron’s own blog. Check it out.

It’s hard not to think “fox in the chicken coop” in response to the public workers union proposal that, if the union were to agree to receiving its health insurance coverage through the state’s Group Insurance Commission (GIC), the union would want half the seats on the GIC board. They already have four of 15 seats. What are they smoking?

AFL-CIO president Robert Haynes, in offering a “spirit of cooperation,” also said the union would want employees to get half the $120 million the cities and towns would otherwise achieve in savings if public workers were to be covered by the GIC. He also wants to give the unions 45 days to come up with a better insurance plan design, after which everything would be submitted to binding arbitration, a recipe for interminable delay and equivocation.
All of which explains why the legislature must approve giving cities and towns the power to design their own employee health insurance plans or join the GIC without union approval.

Our local communities are in dire straits. Rising health insurance premiums are eating up their budgets, and more layoffs are inevitable if they can’t regain control over their health benefits.

Mayor Menino laid it out in no uncertain terms before the legislature yesterday. In the last decade, health insurance costs have more than doubled. (It’s 150 percent statewide, according to the Mass Municipal Association.) The hike has been five times larger than that for other items in the budget. Boston now spends more on health insurance than on its entire police department! That’s jaw-dropping!

Menino has been a real stand-up guy on this issue, asking for the legislature to approve a home rule petition if statewide change is not approved. His willingness to take the lead probably helped push Governor Patrick to get with the program. (In Patrick’s first term, he had pushed successfully to allow local communities to join the GIC with 70 percent approval of the unions. Such a threshold is ridiculously high, which is why of the 351 cities and towns in the state, only a scant two dozen have done so.)
Leaving veto power over insurance plan design in the hands of the unions makes no sense. Workers in the private sector don’t get that. Their employers decide based on a range of financial considerations. The fact is that local taxpayers can no longer afford to pay for benefits for public workers that they don’t have for themselves. And, if municipalities can’t manage employee insurance costs, both municipal employees and local residents will pay another way, by losing services through resulting layoffs. As Menino said at the hearing, “Pretty soon we’re not going to have City Hall; it’ll be the city insurance company.”

There’s something very wrong with that.

Please let me know your thoughts in the comments section below.