Archive for November 28th, 2011

November 28th, 2011

“Flat Red Herrings” by John Edward

by DickH

John Edward, a resident of Chelmsford who earned his master’s degree at UMass Lowell and who teaches economics at Bentley University and UMass Lowell, contributes the following column.

How long does it take you to figure out how much federal tax you owe on your income? If your answer is more than a minute or two, something is seriously wrong.

Some presidential candidates have advocated one form or another of a flat tax. They say we need a flat tax to simplify filing tax returns. If you buy that argument, something is seriously wrong.

In 1913, the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution established the federal personal income tax. It was a progressive tax from the start. A progressive tax applies higher marginal tax rates to incomes above certain levels. For example, in 2010, for married filing jointly, income above $373,650 was taxed at the top rate of 35 percent.

The federal income tax used to be much more progressive. In 1981, the top tax rate was 70 percent. In 1961, it was 91 percent. Until World War II, only the top income earners paid any taxes.

Public sector economists recognize the merits of a progressive tax. First, it adheres to the principle that those with more ability to pay should pay more. Second, the last dollar earned for someone making $40,000 is a lot more valuable to that taxpayer than the last dollar earned by someone making $400,000. Third, a progressive tax upholds a sense of noblesse oblige – a noble idea to which many of the wealthy no longer feel obliged. read more »

November 28th, 2011

Electing Lowell’s Mayor – 1970

by DickH

Even before the final vote was counted a few weeks ago, speculation as it always does had turned to who will be the city’s next mayor. Talk is that Patrick Murphy and Rodney Elliot each have three committed votes with one or more others being noncommittal in the hopes that a stalemate will lead to a compromise candidate. I have my own guess as to what will happen this Inauguration Day, but I’ll keep that to myself for now. While most mayoral contests in the recent past have been decided long before the councilors-elect walk into the chambers that day, not all mayoral elections go as anticipated. Such was the case on January 5, 1970.

The 1969 city election was a tumultuous one that saw the election of five new councilors. Incumbents Tom Crowley, Bob Maguire (who had served as mayor the preceding term), John Cox and Ray Gilbride all failed to win reelection while Ed Early had not run after having been elected state representative the year before. The four incumbents who won reelection that year were Ellen Sampson, Richard Howe Sr, Armand LeMay, and Sam Pollard. Joining them were newcomers Brendan Fleming, Phil Shea, Paul Tsongas, John Mahoney and Leo Farley.

Not long after the election, Howe (my dad) had gained the support of three of the new councilors – Fleming, Shea and Tsongas – while LeMay gained commitments from Mahoney and Farley. Both Sampson and Pollard were non-committal.

That changed the week before the inauguration when Sampson privately told my dad that she would vote for him. With five first ballot votes seemingly in hand, our extended family all arrived at the Monday morning ceremonies in a celebratory mood. As an eleven year-old seventh grader, I was old enough to understand (and clearly remember) what happened next.

When we arrived at city hall, my mom and my younger brother and sister headed into the council chamber to secure some seats while my dad and I carried all of the family’s winter coats into the otherwise empty council cloakroom. While we hung the coats in my dad’s wooden locker, Mrs. Sampson swept into the room. Her first words were “Dick, I’m not going to vote for you.” I was stunned so I can imagine how my dad felt. He told me to go join the rest of the family so I got to break the bad news to all of them. As I subsequently came to understand it, Sampson’s grievance was that my dad had supported the appointment of someone she disliked which was (1) not true and (2) probably just a pretense for some other reason, but the bottom line was that she reneged on her commitment.

There are no secrets in city hall so when the councilors elect walked in to take the oath of office the crowd in the chambers was tense. Soon it was time to elect a mayor. On the first ballot, Howe received four votes (Howe, Fleming, Tsongas & Shea); LeMay had three (LeMay, Mahoney & Farley); while Sampson had two (Sampson & Pollard). The second ballot was a repeat of the first. On the third ballot, Pollard voted for LeMay (giving him four votes) while Sampson voted for herself. On the fourth ballot, the same thing occurred, only Sampson voted for Pollard instead of herself.

On the fifth ballot, Leo Farley, voting first (they vote in alphabetical order) stunned the crowd by switching from LeMay to Howe who then received the four votes he had carried from the beginning, making Richard Howe Sr the new mayor of Lowell.

At the post inaugural luncheon, held at the Towne House Motel (which was located where the 99 Restaurant now stands at Chelmsford Street and Industrial Ave, I overheard my dad thank Farley for his vote and Farley reply that he didn’t like the game that was being played and decided to put a stop to it. I’m not quite sure what game he was talking about, but I didn’t care because I and the rest of the Howe family was quite pleased with the result.

November 28th, 2011

Barney Frank to Retire!

by Marie

Well! Well! According to breakingnews on Channel 7  and elsewhere – Congressman Barney Frank will NOT seek relection in 2012. This timing is strange! Who is next? Will Congressman Tierney take a hard look at his situation? Will long-termer Congressman Markey decide that his time has come? Will Congressman Capuano make way for a “minority” candidate? I don’t expect members Niki Tsongas, Jim McGovern, Richie Neal or Bill Keating to drop-out… that leaves Stephen Lynch. Hmmmm. Frank press conference scheduled for early afternoon. Politics in Massachusetts is never dull! Stay tuned.

November 28th, 2011

In the Merrimack Valley: State Takeover of Lawrence School A Done Deal?

by Marie

While State Commissioner of Education Mitchell Chester and the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education have invited Lawrence residents to a hearing to give their thoughts on a possible state takeover of city’s schools, many think that the “takeover” is already a done deal. The hearing is scheduled for this evening in Malden. In today’s Eagle Tribune writer Alex Bloom notes comments from current and incoming school committee members and the teachers union president that indicate their concern on the one hand of the need for some intervention but on the other that the process might be too speedy.

Will Mitchell make the takeover recommendation to the Board? Bloom tells readers that he indicated so in a recent memo and what the fall-out would be:

“On November 29, I likely will recommend that you declare the Lawrence Public Schools a Level 5 (“chronically underperforming”) district,” state education commissioner Mitchell Chester said in the first sentence of a memo last week to his board members.

The recommendation would give the state’s 11-member Board of Elementary and Secondary Education guidance on what to do about the city’s failing public schools. The board will vote tomorrow morning on the designating Lawrence as “chronically underperforming,” giving Chester the power to install a receiver to takeover the city’s school system. The move strips the city’s School Committee of its authority to govern.

Read the full article here at eagletribune.com.