Archive for January 14th, 2012

January 14th, 2012

Records

by PaulM

We called those round things records when I was growing up. For Christmas, I was the lucky recipient of a TEAC CD Recorder with Turntable/Cassette Player. A nice machine. I thought it would be fun to make my own discs of select LPs and cassette tapes that have been mothballed ever since the family went the route of CDs and then digital music file downloads. I weeded out the album collection several years ago, but held on to about 75 that I wasn’t ready to part with; the cassette tapes number at least as many. The tapes had a longer life because of car music systems, but those got shelved also.

I pulled out the storage crate with the albums, and put on a 1974 James Taylor (“Walking Man”), which sounded just great on the new machine. I’m no audiophile, but the vinyl record made better music than the CD player with iPod dock in the kitchen. Maybe I wanted it to sound better for old times’ sake. In the crate were the first albums I owned, including “A Hard Day’s Night” by The Beatles, whose sleeve is worn at the edges from handling, and a Dino, Desi, and Billy album called “Our Time’s Coming.” My mother special-ordered “Our Time’s Coming” from Record Lane on Central Street because I had to have it after seeing the group on TV. They were kids my age.

I won what was left of my parents’ records after they passed away, really my mother’s music because I don’t remember my father buying a record. He liked music, Sinatra and Al Martino and the Big Bands from the 1940s, and he would sit with her and listen to Barbra Streisand and Louis Armstrong (“Hello Dolly”) and Herb Alpert’s Tijuana Brass. These were played on a combination record player and radio mounted in a large wooden cabinet with speakers that filled a prominent space in our living room. The radio tuning dials and red selection needle were huge. The maker was Philco maybe? The record player was made for 78 rpm discs, of which we had several dozen. I remember listening to “Goodnight Irene” on one of the thick 78s. I think my brother David must have converted the turntable to one that played at 33 and 45 rpms because that was the same piece of furniture that had a turntable for the first rock and roll records I played in the early 1960s. David had worked a summer at Symphonics at the Boott Mills and learned how to assemble record players. Later, I had a small portable record player, a hi-fi system from a bargain department store, and then a real stereo music player.

Looking at the albums this afternoon was a time-machine experience. Each record maintains a place from its past and my past and comes with a string of stories. I had a general idea of what was in the crate, but there were suprises in there. What was not surprising is that my taste in music hasn’t changed a lot in 50 years. The stack of CDs in the CD tower is much more eclectic, but I like what’s in the old albums as much as anything I’ve heard since. I haven’t bought a vinyl record in about 20 years, I guess. I played a Michelle Shocked album from 1988 this afternoon and wrote about it on Facebook, adding a YouTube link to her song “Anchorage,” from the album. The record played beautifully on the new machine. I hope we have a couple of snowstorms this winter, so I can fire up the TEAC player and make discs from the albums and cassettes. I know most if not all of the material is out there on the web, but I like the idea of recycling from my own collection.

January 14th, 2012

The Charter Change Debate in Lowell

by DickH

Whether its being propelled by citizens who want change or the media that wants controversy, a discussion of whether Lowell should switch to a strong mayor form of government broke out this week. I wrote a blog post, In Defense of Plan E last Saturday, then discussed it on City Life on Thursday, and was interviewed by Lyle Moran of the Sun on Friday for a story that’s to appear in Sunday’s newspaper. After these multiple discussions, I thought it advisable to restate my opinion here even though it might repeat some of the arguments in the aforementioned Plan E post.

I think Lowell’s Plan E system works pretty well. Practical political power doesn’t reside in one person as it would with a strong mayor, but is balanced between the council and the city manager. And if the council forced/demanded/required/allowed (pick one) their other two appointees, the Clerk and the Auditor to exercise their authority to the full extent already permitted by statute, then power would be even more balanced.

If the voters don’t like the direction of the city, they can change the council every two years. That’s exactly what happened in 1969 and 1993, the two years in which charter change referendums also appeared on the ballot. In 1969, five new councilors were elected and in 1993 it was six. In both years, the impetus to change the charter died quiet deaths both times. From the historical record, we might infer (as I do) that rising talk of the need to change the charter might telegraph a disruptive election on the horizon but that’s just pure speculation based on historic patterns.

Those who lead such petition drives presumably are dissatisfied with the direction of the city. If not, why seek such a change. I believe that history also shows that under such circumstances, charter change efforts are a distraction, diluting the finite amount of time and energy possessed by those who want change. If the effort expended on charter change was instead focused on candidates, the change sought would be more likely to occur.

Another argument made in support of a charter change is the level of voter participation in municipal elections. In 2011, 20% of the city’s 50,354 voters (9946) went to the polls. I always respond to that statistic with one of my own: the 61% turnout on November 4, 2008 (31,905 of the 51,988 registered voters made it to the polls). True, that was a Presidential election year, but it’s also true that 22,000 voters (the difference in turnout from 2008 to 2011) knew where to vote, were able to get there on a Tuesday, and made the effort. Why don’t those 22,000 vote in city elections? I assume it’s because they feel disconnected from city affairs and doubt very much that altering the way we elect our mayor or councilors will change that. A strategy that sought to connect those people in practical ways with their neighbors, their neighborhood and then their city would do more to increase voter participation than a stack of petitions.

Finally, there are those who argue that the current position of mayor is trivial, limited to cutting ribbons and emceeing square dedications. Those with that view not only misunderstand the office of mayor, they misunderstand political power. While the actual authority of the mayor as chair of the council, the chair of the school committee, and the person who appoints the subcommittees of both is substantial, it’s the intangibles that make the mayor of Lowell such an important figure in the city’s power structure. Lowell is filled with people and entities – governmental, non-profit, corporate or individual – who all perform important missions. But there is no one to coordinate those efforts, no one to be the city’s political air traffic controller. Simply by virtue of the office, Lowell’s mayor has a seat at many tables and can connect people who then pursue common goals. This doesn’t require spending money or issuing orders; it just requires someone with a strategic view making connections. Ironically, when the mayor performs this role well, it’s almost entirely in the background known by just a few. If you doubt this view, just ask any former mayor about it.

January 14th, 2012

Meanderings by Jim Peters

by DickH

Jim Peters contributes the following essay:

My now New Hampshire brother, Tom and I , have been traversing the city and surrounding countryside as we pick up leaves as part of my landscaping business. It is a very interesting exercise because Tom remembers the location of every tree that was there fifteen to twenty years ago. He knows the PowWow Oak on Clark Road, he knows the Olmstead layout as it existed that many years ago at Tyler Park, and he knows of a great many “watering holes” that existed at that time. So, he got me to wondering about what has actually changed.

Do you remember the Curran/Morton Warehouse in downtown Lowell? Did you know that it was built so solidly because it was designed to take a bomb hit during WWII? Jack Kerouac Park now stands at the spot. There was Don Depoian’s Bumper Stickers in the Massachusetts Mills on, I believe, the fifth floor. Out by the river, there was the GE plant. Now, I cannot verify this, because it was passed on to me by word of mouth, but supposedly, in a small building at that site there is the spot where the first American jet engine was tested. They tested at night, and anyone who complained that it was interrupting their sleep was reminded that “Loose lips sink ships.” Even the American mainland was on a tight espionage order.

We continued on. In the building that once housed Hugo’s on Andover Street, there was the bar “The Tiger’s Den.” A police officer owned the popular bar called “The Cell Block.” The “Rialto” was down the street and in the old train station that Jim Cooney virtually gave to the National Park and which has been restored so brilliantly. Bon Marche and Pollard’s owned the downtown, and Lady Grace was next to Bon Marche. Talbots was at the current site of a parking lot on Central Street. Bon Marche owned the building at the end of Kirk Street with the tiny windows on one side. Later, Jordan Marsh, where I started out working full-time after graduation from college eventually took over the Bon Marche location and Pollard’s was the scene of a fire, as I recall. read more »

January 14th, 2012

Can S.C. trash talk stop Romney’s big mo? by Marjorie Arons-Barron

by Tony

The entry below is being cross posted from Marjorie Arons-Barron’s own blog.

By the numbers, Mitt Romney can’t have the GOP Presidential nomination wrapped up until late April. By then he could have aggregated enough of the 1144 delegates needed to win next summer’s convention to take off some time and go boating on Lake Winnipesauke. To date, only 40 delegates have been chosen, two percent of the total. Romney has 20 of them. And he still has to show he can win in the South, which, before the anticipated negative ad barrage in South Carolina, he is poised to do.

He certainly has what George H. W. Bush called “the big mo.” Romney is two for two (omitting that there may have been a 20-vote typo in his favor in the Iowa results) and garnered more than 40 percent of the vote in New Hampshire (better than he, or winner John McCain, did last time). Even more significantly, he won most of the constituencies identified by the pollsters and pundits. Even some Tea Party types (who are not numerous in the Granite State) found him acceptable. New Hampshire also lacks evangelicals, but they will be out in force in South Carolina, where former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum should do better. And Gingrich’s SuperPAC should test the power of negative advertising. Lee Atwater would have really enjoyed this campaign. Romney will still benefit, however, from a fragmented field of primary opponents.

Romney’s teleprompter-delivered speech last night was perfectly packaged and timed to maximize his audience. It had all the rhythm, alliteration, and parallel structures to qualify as an acceptance speech at the Tampa convention. It focused on President Obama rather than on any of the other GOP candidates, and had all the platitudes befitting a promise of “an America that is a land of opportunity and a beacon for freedom”. It was a window into the rest of the 2012 campaign, which, from Romney’s perspective, will be a choice between two destinies: Obama’s “European Socialist welfare state” careening toward bankruptcy and Mitt’s promise of a federal government that is “simpler, smaller and smarter.”

Ron Paul, Rick Perry, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum and 3rd place finisher Jon Huntsman have all pledged to go on to South Carolina. It will be very surprising if they all continue beyond that to Florida January 31, given the costs of campaigning there. Florida, by the way, starts the traditional GOP winner- take- all delegate computation, so, if Romney comes in first even with a low plurality, the locomotive sound you hear will be the Romney train steaming toward inevitability. February is mostly a caucus month, with two of the three primaries to be held in Michigan (home state to George Romney and Mitt as a child) and Arizona, a state with a sizable Mormon population, also home state to John McCain, who has endorsed Romney.

Romney has the money and the organization to surmount the bumps he may hit in less hospitable states, especially in the South, but those bumps should at a minimum make the trip a little more interesting for us political junkies, for whom an early decision would be a bit of a disappointment.

Please let me know your thoughts in the comments section below.

January 14th, 2012

Redistricting ~ A political Evolution?

by Marie

An article by Scott Helman in tomorrow’s Boston Sunday Globe Magazine – and on-line today – about the redistricting process and the results accepted by the legislature and signed into law by Governor Patrick is well worth a read. As someone who testified at one of the regional hearings (Lawrence) and who has been  relocated as a constituent from the 5thCD – now the 3rdCD - into the 6th CD – I find this article an interesting look at the  process and what it might really mean about the current state of politics in the Commonwealth.

From the article:

For the first time in decades, the Legislature managed to create new state legislative and US congressional districts that, by and large, put the voters’ interests above the politicians’.

Read it here at boston.com. – “Mass. voting maps reflect State House evolution”

Take a look at our past blog post and comments from MassMoments on the history of the gerrymander: http://www.richardhowe.com/2011/02/11/massmoments-birth-of-the-gerrymander/