Archive for January 31st, 2012

January 31st, 2012

Flags at half-staff

by DickH

At work I subscribe to an email service from the Governor’s office that notifies recipients anytime the Governor orders flags to be flown at half-staff. The text of one that arrived today went something like this:

Please be advised that Governor Patrick has ordered that the United States flag and the Commonwealth flag be lowered to half-staff at all state buildings from sunrise until sunset on Wednesday, February 1, 2012 in honor of Mayor Kevin H. White of Boston, Massachusetts who died on January 27, 2012.

While the passing of Mayor White is certainly a solemn occasion, I found just a little bit of irony in the timing and substance of this notice given the communal discussion we’re engaged in here in Lowell about the propriety of lowering flags in honor of the passing of local election officials. Gerry Nutter had posts here and here on the topic and Councilor Rita Mercier filed a motion at last week’s council meeting. I didn’t watch tonight’s meeting so I don’t know if there has yet been a reply. According to the minutes of last week’s meeting, the motion and the discussion was as follows:

City Council set policy as standard procedure to automatically lower the flag on city property to half mast when elected officials die. RE: Congress, State Senators, State Representatives, Mayors, City Councilors and School Committee Members. In Council, read and adopted. So voted. C. Martin stated that he is under the belief that only the Governor can order any municipal building to fly flag at half-mast. C. Kennedy stated that this is a situation when you go ahead and do it until you are told not to.

As I said, I hadn’t been paying much attention to this issue until the Kevin White notice arrived today. Curious, I did a little Googling and found that 4 US Code section 7 makes it pretty clear that only the President or the Governor of a state may order the flag lowered to half-staff. I’m not sure if an express Federal law prohibiting something meets the “do it until you are told not to” test but it probably does. Not that I’m criticizing that approach; “it’s easier to get forgiveness than permission” has helped me overcome innumerable bureaucratic obstacles. Still, the law’s the law.

Another outfit, USFlag.org, also addresses this issue. When you read their post on half-staff flags, you can tell they’ve been severely criticized for saying “no half-staff” in the past:

[National Flag Foundation] points out these “good-faith misunderstandings” not to criticize or embarrass anyone, but rather to head off a growing trivialization of this memorial salute, and to preserve the dignity and significance of flying the U.S. flag at half-staff. To any readers who may think that NFF is insensitive for raising these breaches of etiquette, please be assured that our motives are pure. We grieve these human loses deeply; however, we believe proper respect for our flag must be maintained – no matter the circumstances.

Everyone involved in this discussion wants to do the right thing which is to appropriately honor those decedents who have rendered valuable service to the city of Lowell. There’s no doubt that working together, appropriate and standardized methods of recognition can be found and implemented.

January 31st, 2012

Archdiocese of Boston Losing the Chancellor

by Marie

The Boston Globe is reporting that the current Chancellor for the Archdiocese of Boston James P. McDonough has decided to step down after six years on the job. Complimenting McDonough for getting the finances of the archdiocese on a sound footing, Cardinal Sean O’Malley announced that he has chosen John E. Straub to fill the role of interim chancellor. Straub currently serves as executive director of finance and operations for central ministries with the Archdiocese. Straub had previously directed the White House’s Office of Administration during the George W. Bush administration.

The timing of McDonough’s leaving coincides with recently released annual financial report for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2011. The January 26 report was accompanied by this statement from the Cardinal:

 ”The Archdiocese of Boston has greatly benefitted by the financial management of recent years that has achieved and sustained a balanced budget. The stabilization of our finances has led to increased confidence among our many generous benefactors, who provide us the means to invest in our parishes, schools, evangelization and the important mission of serving the poor and those in need. We are aware that there remain challenges to be addressed, but are encouraged by the progress being made in rebuilding our local Church. Going forward, we will maintain our commitment to be a sign of the presence of the Lord to the Catholics of the Archdiocese and the wider community.”

Among the highlights of the report:

  • Central ministries, a component of central operations, achieved a balanced budget maintained for second straight year;
  • Parish offertory increased 3 percent;
  • Enrollment grew in over half of the Archdiocese’s Catholic schools and increased by 1 percent in Boston for the first time in 20 years.

Read the full financial report by linking here to The Pilot. The Globe story can be read here at boston.com.

January 31st, 2012

Video Surveillance for Downtown?

by DickH

The behavior of (some) late night occupants of downtown Lowell has been a trending topic in Lowell’s blogosphere with kad barma writing about it here and here; Left in Lowell here and here; and our own post here. The police have increased their presence which is a good thing; a high density of officers in uniform creates a deterrent and making arrests where appropriate at least might keep those defendants under control for a while. But the police can’t be everywhere all the time.

Is it time for the city to bring video surveillance cameras to downtown? I’m not sure I like the idea because it would be a bit of an invasion of privacy of the vast majority of law-abiding citizens, but life is all about trade-offs. If cameras could help apprehend those who destroy property and soil our sidewalks and doorways and provide the police with a valuable tool in enforcing the law, then might that level of intrusion be worth it? I’m guessing that the acquisition costs for such a system would be tolerable, certainly within the budget of a typical regional public relations campaign that gets washed away by a single widely-covered crime.

Perhaps the time has arrived to have a public discussion on video surveillance cameras for downtown Lowell.

January 31st, 2012

An Idea for a Lowell Video

by PaulM

Watch this video that celebrates one day in San Francisco and think about what a Lowell version would look like.

A Day in the Life: San Francisco

UPDATE: Here’s the video

January 31st, 2012

Postcard video of Lowell

by Tony

This is a great video of Lowell put together by Buddy 212002 using postcards. There are some amazing old scenes of the the downtown area.

This video is titled “Greetings From Lowell”.