<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Pirate Party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.richardhowe.com/2012/05/02/the-pirate-party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.richardhowe.com/2012/05/02/the-pirate-party/</link>
	<description>Lowell Politics and Lowell History</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 01:19:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: C R Krieger</title>
		<link>http://www.richardhowe.com/2012/05/02/the-pirate-party/comment-page-1/#comment-13525</link>
		<dc:creator>C R Krieger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 17:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardhowe.com/?p=15106#comment-13525</guid>
		<description>I think IP needs to be looked at.&#160; The artists and their producers should have their fair share.&#160; However, I believe the current Copyright laws provide more than a fair share&#8212;and thus stifle creativity.

Further, the recording industry failed to use technology to liberate its audience.&#160; We went from the 78 to the 45, with one desired track and something the record producer stuck us with.&#160; Popular music went to the 33 1/3 and then to tapes and then CDs.&#160; The industry could have sustained itself by letting people cut their own tapes and CDs at music stores.&#160; It didn&#039;t.&#160; Acting in a rapacious manner, it stuck us with stuff we didn&#039;t want as the price for buying what we did.&#160; Humans being what they are, people moved to get around this abuse.&#160; Now we have iTunes.

Laws need to adapt to society and to technology and the Copyright laws are not adapting.

I can see the reason for the Pirate Party.

Regards&#160; &#8212;&#160; Cliff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think IP needs to be looked at.&nbsp; The artists and their producers should have their fair share.&nbsp; However, I believe the current Copyright laws provide more than a fair share&mdash;and thus stifle creativity.</p>
<p>Further, the recording industry failed to use technology to liberate its audience.&nbsp; We went from the 78 to the 45, with one desired track and something the record producer stuck us with.&nbsp; Popular music went to the 33 1/3 and then to tapes and then CDs.&nbsp; The industry could have sustained itself by letting people cut their own tapes and CDs at music stores.&nbsp; It didn&#8217;t.&nbsp; Acting in a rapacious manner, it stuck us with stuff we didn&#8217;t want as the price for buying what we did.&nbsp; Humans being what they are, people moved to get around this abuse.&nbsp; Now we have iTunes.</p>
<p>Laws need to adapt to society and to technology and the Copyright laws are not adapting.</p>
<p>I can see the reason for the Pirate Party.</p>
<p>Regards&nbsp; &mdash;&nbsp; Cliff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ike Sharpless</title>
		<link>http://www.richardhowe.com/2012/05/02/the-pirate-party/comment-page-1/#comment-13522</link>
		<dc:creator>Ike Sharpless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 18:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardhowe.com/?p=15106#comment-13522</guid>
		<description>I enjoy following your blog on my Google Reader feed, and thought I should chime in on this - I&#039;m an adjunct political science instructor at UML (ikesharpless.pbworks.com), and JP is actually a former student of mine. Partially I think he&#039;s running on the Pirate ticket precisely so he can get some press for breaking ground. His views on IP are a bit to the left of mine, but he&#039;s a smart, caring, and thoughtful guy who I think would make a great representative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoy following your blog on my Google Reader feed, and thought I should chime in on this &#8211; I&#8217;m an adjunct political science instructor at UML (ikesharpless.pbworks.com), and JP is actually a former student of mine. Partially I think he&#8217;s running on the Pirate ticket precisely so he can get some press for breaking ground. His views on IP are a bit to the left of mine, but he&#8217;s a smart, caring, and thoughtful guy who I think would make a great representative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
