Archive for May 15th, 2012

May 15th, 2012

“Lowell’s ‘other’ famous football playing author” by Jay Gaffney

by DickH

Longtime Tewksbury resident Jay Gaffney (who recently moved to Lowell) very kindly shared this terrific tale of two football playing authors whose athletic careers brought them to the playing fields of Lowell, Massachusetts. Jay can be contacted at JJGiiiLaw@verizon.net

Copyright, James J. Gaffney III, 2012
LOWELL’S “OTHER” FAMOUS FOOTBALL PLAYING AUTHOR.

Lowell can turn up in unexpected places. For me, one surprise encounter was reading Rich Man Poor Man author Irwin Shaw’s short story, God on Friday Night. Lamenting the hardships of his solitary travels, Shaw’s main character, Sol the comedian, says “I’m a man who has to play in cheap nightclubs in Philadelphia, and Lowell Massachusetts and Boston. Yuh don’t know how lonely it can get at night in Lowell Massachusetts”. (Decades P.90) * Another surprise was learning that Jack Kerouac was not the only famous gridiron author who dug his cleats into Lowell turf. Irwin Shaw played his football for Brooklyn College, but on two cold fall afternoons in 1932 and 1933, Shaw and his Brooklyn College Warriors (Yearbook P.207) brought their game to Textile Field and Alumni Stadium to take on the Lowell Textile Millmen.

In Lowell, Kerouac is the name which football playing writers usually brings to mind. His football exploits were part of the Kerouac legend along with On the Road and the Beat Generation. His 1938 game winning touchdown against Thanksgiving Day rival Lawrence High led to expectations of football fame which could have been the stuff of a pretty good legend by itself. As described in the October, 1989 Sports Illustrated Article: “Before he met Allen Ginsberg and William Burroughs; before his cross-country jaunts in drive-away Chevys and empty boxcars; before the jazz, the dope, the manic prose and finally the fame; before he became tormented by the success he sought and drank himself to death; before all that, Kerouac was, purely and simply, a football star.”(SI P.1)

Kerouac’s football career got off to a slow start. He didn’t see much playing time until his senior year – even then spending a lot of time on the bench. He wasn’t even on the field to start of the famous Lawrence game. (Angel P.26) The Lowell Sun called him a “situational player.”(SI P.3) His sporadic playing time generated some heated local debate. Coach Keady called him a “climax runner” (SI P.2, T&C P.72) secret weapon held in reserve for critical game situations – possibly a PR ploy to quiet the “we want Kerouac” chants from the stands. One of Lowell lore’s go to sources, Father Armand “Spike” Morrisette, thought Keady was one of those rigid coaches who “when he had his mind made up on a lineup, that’s the way it stayed” (SI P.6) Kerouac’s father Leo, as portrayed in The Vanity of Duluoz always suspected skullduggery afoot and blamed “payoffs” for keeping his son on the bench. (Vanity P.171)

The undersized Shaw’s situation never attracted any conspiracy theory attention – he barely made his Madison High School team and never got off the bench. (Shaw P.29) After graduation, Kerouac’s football career seemed poised to build on that Lawrence game touchdown. Columbia (Vanity P.23) had outbid BC and Notre Dame for his gridiron services. His next stop – as a self described “ringer” (Cassidy P.168) was Horace Mann Prep School where Coach Lou Little sometimes stashed red shirt prospects (Angel P33). Kerouac led that team to an undefeated season and City Championship. (Sub P.46) His freshman season at Columbia got off to a fast start “probably the best back on the field’(SI P.7) until it was ended by a broken leg in his second game (SI P.8, Sub P.52). Returning for his sophomore year, he found himself languishing on the bench again. Lou Little had compared Kerouac to Sid Luckman, (SI P.1) but praise didn’t translate into playing time, and, by now, the old Lowell High perseverance was gone. When the 1941 season opened with Kerouac on the bench, he quit – the team and then the school. He drifted back to Lowell, did some sports writing for the Lowell Sun and signed on for a wartime Merchant Marine hitch dodging German U-boats to bring munitions to England.(Angel 52.)When his ship returned, the flame of football glory flickered briefly – only to fizzle out in another playing time dispute. Little sent Kerouac a telegram urging him to rejoin the team for the 1942 season (SI P.8, SubP. 65). When he showed up, Kerouac, once again, mostly sat. Kerouac wanted to get in against Army so he could show up old Lowell High rival and now Army team captain, Hank Mazur. (Angel P.59) When the game ended with Kerouac stuck on the bench, he walked again – this time for good – off on the first steps of his literary journey with its famous milestone, On the Road. read more »

May 15th, 2012

Greater Lowell Area Dems (GLAD) to Meet This Saturday ~ May 19, 2012

by Marie

Reminder for next GLAD Meeting

Greater Lowell Area Democrats Regular  Breakfast Meeting

This Saturday May 19, 2012

8:00 AM SHARP

Independence Grill at the Radisson Hotel  Rte. 110 in Chelmsford

Special guests: 

Candidates for Governor’s Council in 5th and 6th Districts

Former State Rep Barbara L’Italien  Candidate in the new 18th Essex Rep District

Presentation by the Greater Lowell Area Elizabeth Warren Campaign Committee

At 9:30am – Delegate Training for June 2, 2012 Mass Dems Convention

Please join us at this meeting of area Democrats.

Marie Sweeney, GLAD Chair

sweeney133@verizon.net

 

May 15th, 2012

Obama and the politics of gay marriage by Marjorie Arons-Barron

by Tony

The entry below is being cross posted from Marjorie Arons-Barron’s own blog. Check it out here.

It would have been easier for Barack Obama to wait until after the election to announce that he thinks gays should have the right to marry. He could have let people assume that V.P. Joe Biden’s and Education Secretary Arne Duncan’s comments to that effect were a hint that such was the thinking inside the Administration. When Obama was running for the Illinois State Senate in 1996, a candidate questionnaire said he supported gay marriage. His people now say that the questionnaire was filled out by someone else. Jeez.

Back to now. President Obama didn’t have to jeopardize his standing in his 2012 reelection bid, especially in the swing states. My conversations with some gays after Biden’s Sunday comment suggest that they understood the difficulties the issue presents him electorally and, while disappointed in Obama’s slowness on the issue, they still wanted to ensure his reelection. They are thrilled, of course, though nervous about the political fallout.

Much is at stake here. Evangelicals and other Christian conservatives were never going to vote for him, so there’s nothing lost there. Obama’s “evolved” position is, however, at odds with the views of many African-Americans, but it’s hardly likely that they will abandon him in the election. The question there is: will they show up at the polls? Hispanics have been overwhelmingly for Obama, with Republicans trying to figure out a way to tap their increasingly significant slice of the electorate. This may help the GOP somewhat, but Hispanic voters remain more affected by the candidates’ positions on immigration than their views on gay marriage.

Polls put people’s support for gays’ right to marry at around 52 percent, while older people are far more opposed and younger people favor it by a two-to-one margin. Older people can be depended upon to vote, not so much the younger voters. Will this now energize them to get engaged, as they were four years ago?

What we won’t know until November is how middle-of-the-roaders in swing states will be affected by this announcement, coming six months before the election. My guess is that the main debate will continue to be about jobs and the economy and a range of budget decisions, including changes in Medicare and the health system.

I was puzzled about why Obama, if he views this as a civil rights issue, wouldn’t support action at the federal level. I asked Barney Frank, who replied that marriage has traditionally been a matter reserved for the states, except when the Supreme Court intervenes, as it did with interracial marriage. The only Congressional intervention has been a negative, the Defense of Marriage Act (DoMA), which Bill Clinton signed into law. The GOP 2012 platform seeks to have DoMA enshrined as an amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

In dramatic contrast, Obama directed the Justice Department not to enforce DoMA, which he deems unconstitutional. He also did away with“don’t ask, don’t tell” and now is the first President to support gay marriage. He gets credit for taking a political risk and standing up for a principle. That much is clear. By November, given the emphasis on the economy, it may not matter one way or the other.

I’d greatly appreciate your thoughts in the comments section below.