Bloomberg is for marijuana and against sugary drinks by Marjorie Arons-Barron

The entry below is being cross posted from Marjorie Arons-Barron’s own blog. Be sure to check it out too.

NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg yesterday urged the decriminalization of small amounts of marijuana.  This follows on the heels of last week’s move to ban the sale of sugary drinks in cups exceeding 16 ounces.  At first, this looks contradictory: pot’s okay but not a big container of sugary beverage. Enough mayoral micromanaging!

Still, let’s look at what the Mayor would like.  In the first instance, he is backing a proposal by Governor Andrew Cuomo to decriminalize possession of 25 grams of marijuana, which has already been downgraded to a misdemeanor.  Smoking pot in public is still a (criminal) misdemeanor and, if convicted, you end up with a record.  With the change, conviction for having weed with the lint in your pocket won’t keep you from securing a job, housing or otherwise getting on with your life.  And it will save police resources for far more important transgressions.  Massachusetts voters took the same route in a 2008 referendum, and there haven’t been any problems, according to reports in the Boston Globe. So Bloomberg and Cuomo are right on this one.

 

 

 

 

photo sugarstacks.com

But Bloomberg’s sugary drink ban, while focusing on the serious public health problem of obesity, seems just too much Big Brother.  According to media reports, with the Bloomberg proposal you couldn’t buy a container of sugary sodas or even pre-sweetened tea if it were larger than a medium cup of coffee.  Of course, you’d still have the right to buy two 16-oz. containers and drink both, so you’re not losing your right to indulge. If you’re in a restaurant, ballpark, movie theater or at a sidewalk cart, places regulated by the public health department, you’d have to pause and, if you were hell-bent on consuming all that sugar, buy double.  (Of course, that’s what the cinema industry would push for inasmuch as the actual movies are a less important source of revenue than all the junk consumables they market.)

Bloomberg’s target is any drink that has more than 25 calories per eight ounces.  What about desserts?  Most ice cream has over 450 calories in the same amount. Is that next on the list of items to be banned? And given the nearly hundreds of calories in a slice of pepperoni pizza, should we ban the pepperoni?

I’m all for replacing high calorie sugary drinks in vending machines and cafeterias in schools. After all, a 12-oz can has the equivalent of ten teaspoons of sugar.  And studies have shown that anywhere from half to 85 percent of children has at least one such a drink each day. Male teens reportedly consume four such drinks per day.

But getting into adults’ consumption habits just seems like nanny state overreaching and a weak substitute for meaningful public education, including bold product labelling, making sure people understand they do have choices, and helping to ensure those choices are accessible.

Leave a Reply