Author Archive

August 29th, 2011

A Post in Reply to a Comment

by Andrew

On my last post, there were a number of comments, but I wanted to highlight one thing Cliff wrote. I thought that this part of a comment he left was worth a full response. Quoted directly: “We can pound Gov Perry for pandering to those of his supporters who don’t believe in evolution.  But, in fact, if God created the whole shebang six thousand years ago, how would we know?  I don’t think that is the way it came to be, but I would not dismiss someone who did.”

Before I get into how we know the creation hypothesis is incorrect, I would like to address a more philosophical point. We live in a culture that encourages us to have strong opinions, be it about whether politician X should be president or whether Jersey Shore can be considered “culture.” Is this a good thing? Maybe, maybe not. It is good to disagree; it keeps life interesting and ensures that we are exposed to many different viewpoints. Currently in our culture, there are several disciplines of science that are subjected to this type of handling. I would argue that this does a great disservice to our society. read more »

August 19th, 2011

Governor Perry’s First Week

by Andrew

It has been fascinating to watch Governor Rick Perry’s first week of campaigning. Before he announced, I began to think that he would be the nominee, if for no other reason than governors tend to do well in presidential races and Romney is, well, Romney. Governor Perry said a lot of interesting things this week, such as that the stimulus did not create any jobs when it created 50,000 in his own state. But there were four moments in particular that I think illustrate the type of president he would be.

In Monday Perry opened his campaign with this statement: “We’re calling today on the president of the United States to put a moratorium on regulations across this country, because his regulations, his EPA regulations are killing jobs all across America.” To begin with, I think it is worth noting that this is a fairly nonsensical proposal; it’s just that it makes for a good sound bite. The key to understanding what Perry is trying to get at is his reference to the EPA, this week’s Republican punching bag. I do not dispute that EPA regulations mean that there are less jobs out there. I just prefer to refer to EPA regulations as those government policies that are keeping your children from having bone cancer and malformed brains. I will leave it up to you to decide which is your priority. read more »

July 7th, 2011

The Final Shuttle Mission

by Andrew

On Friday July 8th, at 11:26AM NASA will launch the space shuttle Atlantis on STS-135, the final shuttle mission. It marks the end of an era that began on April 12, 1981 with the first flight of Columbia. 135 missions later, the United States’ fourth great space program, the successor to Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo, has come to its end.

I was born between STS-31 and STS-41, the 35th and 36th shuttle missions, both flights of the shuttle Discovery. STS-31 was the mission to deploy the Hubble Telescope. I have never known anything but the shuttle program. Quite frankly, I have taken it for granted; I cannot imagine it being over. But after tomorrow the United States will no longer have the ability to put astronauts into orbit; we will be reliant on Russian Soyuz rockets for the foreseeable future. Not only is there no plan to replace the shuttle, but now Congress is preparing to cancel the Webb Telescope, which was to be the successor to the Hubble, taking us back even closer to the Big Bang than Hubble is capable of.

The shuttle is the most complicated machine ever built, consisting of over a million moving parts. The time and work involved in preparing a shuttle for launch is unimaginable. The shuttles have given us the Hubble and the International Space Station. And they have given us more technological and scientific breakthroughs than most of us will ever know. read more »

May 30th, 2011

The Fascination with Gold

by Andrew

One of the more fascinating trends to arise in the wake of the financial crisis has been the renewed interest of the political right in gold. Today’s New York Times ran a story about the latest part of this trend: Utah has passed a law allowing gold and silver coins to be used as currency. While there is certainly a question of the constitutionality of this law, it’s interesting to think about the arguments and reasoning behind it.

The main idea driving the interest in gold is the fear that the US dollar will eventually collapse. Baring a failure to raise the debt ceiling before August 2nd, the probability of this happening is effectively zero (discussed at end of post). Besides, a collapse of the dollar would lead to a worldwide depression far worse than the Great Depression; I doubt having a form of currency based on a traditionally precious metal will be our greatest concern.

Investing in gold is actually a fairly risky action for a number of reasons. The first is that the price of gold, assuming the current trend of holding it rather than spending it continues, is effectively a function of how quickly it can be mined in South Africa. If the relevant companies mine a lot, the price will go down. If they mine a little, the price will go up. It has little to do with the actual intrinsic value of the metal, which is, if we are honest with ourselves, not that great.

But let us assume that gold does become a normal form of currency. What happens then? Well, as the amount of gold being used for currency increases, one would expect its value to fall. This would mean that any gold you held would be becoming increasingly less valuable. That doesn’t exactly seem like a great investment.

The market, as opposed to the advertisers on TV, is still making it very clear that US Treasury Bonds are the safest investment available. There are no indications from the bond market that investors think the US is facing a debt crisis or that the dollar is at risk. In fact, rates are currently falling, presumably due to both political parties contemplating austerity measures, indicating the investors are worried about more economic stagnation (due to austerity measures).

May 28th, 2011

Vermont’s Single Payer Healthcare System

by Andrew

On Thursday Vermont became the first state to enact a single payer healthcare system for its citizens. It’s not exactly surprising that one of the country’s most liberal states has become the first state to legislate a fundamental right to healthcare for all of its citizens. And, should the federal government allow them to proceed, it is only a few years until Vermont surpasses Massachusetts in the percentage of its population that has access to healthcare.

About a week ago, the New York Times ran a story about the campaign to pass this law. The article focused mostly on one of the main advocates for the law, though it did briefly quote one of the main opponents, a former Republican state senator. For once we weren’t subjected to the same tired old excuses, that government has no place in the healthcare market, meant to protect the healthcare industry.

The argument, also used during the fight over national healthcare reform, was that the new healthcare law, specifically the new taxes that would be necessary to enact it, would drive businesses from Vermont. This is an argument that of course makes little sense; Vermont will be replacing its current healthcare system with a cheaper one. Businesses that currently provide healthcare to their employees will almost certainly see a fall in their expenditures on healthcare. Yes, businesses that do not provide healthcare to their employees will be negatively impacted, but are these the type of businesses one wants in their state? read more »

February 19th, 2011

Citizens and Independence

by Andrew

Last year, Harvard undergraduates organized the first Harvard Thinks Big, an opportunity for ten professors from different departments to give talks on a subject they care about. The event was based on the famous TED Talks and was a great success. Harvard Thinks Big 2 was held last Thursday. While I was unable to attend, one of the talks has made it onto Youtube and I felt it was interesting and moving and thus worth sharing.

The talk was given by Harvard Law School Professor Lawrence Lessig, who teaches constitutional law and institutional ethics. The talk focuses on how we as citizens can and must fix our broken political system. Professor Lessig includes a fascinating history lesson and gives quite a compelling argument. But perhaps what is most striking about his talk is that Americans of all political persuasions, I think, will agree with him and can unite around his plan for reclaiming our representative democracy.

February 12th, 2011

Darwin Day

by Andrew

Today we celebrate Charles Darwin’s birthday. The great biologist was born 202 years ago, meaning that it has been just over 151 years since the publication of On the Origin of Species. I have written in the past about his ideas, so to avoid repeating myself I would like to focus on the state of biology education in the United States today.

On January 28th a report was published in the journal Science entitled “Defeating Creationism in the Courtroom, But Not in the Classroom.” The researchers sought to survey what our students are currently being taught in biology classrooms. The results were not promising.

They found that only 28% of American biology teachers instruct their students in evolution as recommended by the National Research Council, which works in conjunction with the National Academy of Sciences. In other words, only 28% of our teachers are teaching students basic biology. read more »

January 11th, 2011

Taking A Step Back

by Andrew

I’ve spent the past few days reading media reactions to the shooting in Tucson. There have been many calls for more civility, for more gun control, and better treatment of mental disorders, but I haven’t seen much in the way of accepting responsibility. I am not looking for the Sarah Palins of the world to take responsibility for the shooting; I doubt any rational person, once they put aside their emotional response to the shooting, would accuse her or Fox or anyone like them for causing this incident. What I have been waiting for is someone to step back and say, “Hey, maybe we should tone it down.” And while I’ve certainly seen such calls, the New York Times editorial staff wasn’t exactly a case study in excessive rhetoric prior to the shooting.

Much to my surprise, I found what I was looking for on Matt Taibbi’s blog today. The post can be read here. For those of you unfamiliar with Taibbi, he writes Rolling Stone’s political affairs column and is one of the more bombastic liberal commentators out there, though he is far from being a partisan Democrat; you’re as likely to read him attacking the Democrats as the Republicans and he is perhaps most well known for his attacks on the excesses of Wall Street.

Now, Taibbi, to the best of my knowledge, has never engaged in violent rhetoric, unless we’re counting comparing Goldman Sachs to a vampire squid as inciting violence. Rather, he is guilty of what so many commentators have done in recent years: excessive rhetoric demonizing their opponents. That being said, Taibbi is rather tame by Fox News standards; there’s a difference between claiming members of both parties are unfit to govern and claiming that the Democrats are destroying our country. read more »

December 31st, 2010

The Year in Science

by Andrew

This was an interesting year for science. But rather than stretch for a list of the top ten accomplishments or discoveries I would like to focus in on three specific feats of technological achievement that, I think, have broad implications both for the future of science and how humanity views itself.

I begin with the discovery of hundreds of exoplanet candidates in our galaxy. This does not mean that astronomers have found hundreds of exoplanets (though, with 100 billion stars in the Milky Way, it’s safe to assume that there are at least billions of planets). Rather, using indirect measurements, astronomers have found what look to be planets. As better telescopes (well, spectrographs) come online, astronomers will be able to confirm whether these are in fact planets.

There was one other very interesting find when it comes to exoplanets. In September one team of researchers was able to identify the first exoplanet known to hold liquid water. However, this discovery was contested when a second team could not find the planet. Whether the planet does exist and does contain water will remain in question; however, there is no question that somewhere out there exist other planets that do contain liquid water. Astronomers are currently looking for planets that have “biomarkers,” or the correct elements and compounds that would allow for life. Carbon. Oxygen. Water. Methane. Carbon dioxide. As well as uranium, potassium, and thorium to allow for tectonic activity. It may very well be that life exists within our solar system (Europa, Titan, Io, and Enceladus are all candidates). read more »

December 27th, 2010

Radiative Forcings

by Andrew

In my last post, I discussed how scientists have been able to prove that the increase in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is due to human activity. It’s now time to discuss why carbon dioxide matters. Below is a chart from the IPCC of radiative forcings, which I explain below.

Before I can explain forcings, there is an important concept that we need to remember from high school physics: every system is in an energy equilibrium (the second law of thermodynamics). This applies to the Earth, meaning that the Earth must radiate as much energy as it absorbs. Translated into what actually happens, the Earth must emit as much energy as it absorbs from the sun, meaning that if the amount it absorbs rises, the Earth’s temperature must rise to compensate.

A forcing is anything that perturbs that balance, by either raising or lowering the amount of energy the Earth absorbs from the sun. Positive forcings raise that amount, mostly by trapping sunlight that has already entered the Earth’s atmosphere and has been reflected off the Earth’s surface, preventing it from escaping into space. Negative forcings raise the albedo of the Earth, meaning that they increase the amount of sunlight the Earth reflects. read more »